Emilia Jarochowska and Wilma Wessels (Utrecht University)
This is an example rubric for an exercise worth (an arbitrary number of) 10 points.
| Criterion | Insufficient (0, 50%] | Satisfactory (50%, 65%] | Good to excellent (65%, 80%] | Total points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis and visualisation | No or missing plots, plots showing incorrect information | Plots showing correct information but not formatted correctly (no or wrong axis labels or legends), only part of the plots produced | All plots showing correct information and formatted correctly, axes and legends complete and correct | 2 |
| Code and reproducibility | Code missing or not executable, e.g. paths to files are missing or wrong, operations on objects that had not been created | Code executable but does not satisfy the instructions, e.g. incorrect format, no documentation, redundant or unnecessary commands | The code can be executed and allows reproducing the analysis. It is integrated with the explanations and follows the instructions concerning formatting. | 3 |
| Final report | Report missing or Report lacking conclusions or Report not based on the analysis |
The text integrates information from the analysis and refers to the figures so a reader can follow the reasoning and the interpretation of the changes in the environment. It provides conclusions on climate changes since the Pleistocene in the studied area. |
The text integrates information from the analysis and refers to the figures so a reader can follow the reasoning and the interpretation of the changes in the environment. It provides conclusions on climate changes since the Pleistocene in the studied area and addresses questions listed in the instructions in a logical and reflected way. |
5 |