Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BioLQM models should have an associated initial state #19

Open
jonrkarr opened this issue Sep 16, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

BioLQM models should have an associated initial state #19

jonrkarr opened this issue Sep 16, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@jonrkarr
Copy link

Running simulations with synchronous updating produces the same results from SBML files with different initialLevels.

@aurelien-naldi
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, it does ignore it as bioLQM models have no internal state (SBML is the only input format specifying an initial level).
It would be nice to support it, at least for simulations, maybe in other places as well.

@aurelien-naldi
Copy link
Contributor

As stated in #18, the addition of an initial state to the model itself would require the addition of getter/setters for this new object

@aurelien-naldi aurelien-naldi changed the title biolqm.trace appears to ignore initial levels (@initialLevel) in SBML files BioLQM models should have an associated initial state Sep 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants