Benchmarking Zango's effectiveness in developing production ready Minimum Viable Products (MVPs)

[kc-diabeat]

Zango is a Django meta-framework designed for developing custom business applications, significantly reducing development costs. It combines the rapid development benefits of low-code frameworks while retaining the customizability of Django. Also, Zango's packages ensures that applications are of high (product) quality.

This makes Zango a powerful framework for quickly implementing high-quality Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) at significantly lower development costs, without compromising future customizability.

Recently, a startup successfully rolled out their MVP from scratch on Zango within a short timeline of 2-3 weeks. The development team consisted of one junior Django developer with no frontend experience. Our back of the envelop estimate is that with Zango, they were able to reduce development costs by up to 70% compared to traditional Django development.

Requirement of the MVP that was implemented:

• A web application allowing customers to sign up and complete a multi-step questionnaire before landing on their dashboard.
• Customers can sign up using an email ID with OTP or through Google OIDC.
• Customers can log support tickets.
• The CRM team can manage signed-up customers and their tickets.
• The CRM team can update the status of tickets to "In-progress" with a due date and an optional remark. Tickets can also be marked as "closed."
• Customers receive email notifications when ticket statuses are updated.

What is your assessment of the development effort required for such an implementation using other available options such as:

• Django or equivalent web frameworks
• Low code/ No code frameworks