Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complains for missing "editor" for "Online" entries #414

Closed
crystalfp opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Complains for missing "editor" for "Online" entries #414

crystalfp opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs
Milestone

Comments

@crystalfp
Copy link

JR 3.0 but also 2.11
Running in biblatex mode.
My "Online" entries are marked as problematic because there is no "editor" field.
But per biblatex documentation (2.1.1 page 10) you need author or editor, but both are not required.
And I have the "author" field filled.
Again, it is a small thing.
Thanks for looking!
mario

@lenhard lenhard added the bug Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs label Nov 30, 2015
@lenhard lenhard added this to the v3.1 milestone Nov 30, 2015
@lenhard
Copy link
Member

lenhard commented Nov 30, 2015

Thanks for the notification! This shouldn't be too hard to fix and will be corrected in a future release.

@stefan-kolb
Copy link
Member

I can confirm this bug. We need to rework all required and optional fields for the BibLaTex entries. This was only done for Bibtex and IEEETran entries. This is not only a problem for ONLINE but also for other BibLaTex entry types.

Also see http://ctan.mirrorcatalogs.com/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf for information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants