Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect summary #1356

Open
pombredanne opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Incorrect summary #1356

pombredanne opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@pombredanne
Copy link
Contributor

pombredanne commented Aug 7, 2024

I ran a scan_single_package for https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/29/8a/f4cf3f32bc554f9260b645ea1151449ac13525796d3d1a42076d75945d8d/Pillow-9.5.0-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl and the summary is weird:
summary-2024-08-07-14-20-19.json
The clarity score does not take into account the declared license, even though we have one
Screenshot 2024-08-07 at 16-48-44 ScanCode io 816fb3bf3e f95201a764 ce71b4612d

{
  "declared_license_expression": "historical",
  "license_clarity_score": {
    "score": 0,
    "declared_license": false,
    "identification_precision": false,
    "has_license_text": false,
    "declared_copyrights": false,
    "conflicting_license_categories": true,
    "ambiguous_compound_licensing": true
  },
  "declared_holder": "",
  "primary_language": "Python",
  "other_license_expressions": [
    {
.....
@tdruez
Copy link
Contributor

tdruez commented Aug 8, 2024

Similar to #1355 (comment)

The "License clarity" and "Scan summary" panels display information as provided by the toolkit --license --classify --summary options.

@pombredanne This issue is probably more relevant in https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants