You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure which glyph to keep, probably leaning towards CN, although HK is better designed at the Heavy weight.
Red - CN, Blue - HK (shared with TW)
Also with regards to the 尔 issue (#352), probably might need adjustment to comply with GB standards...?
Also applies to Serif (but not the 尔 part). Leaning towards CN for this one, but HK has better spacing.
Red - CN, Blue - HK (shared with TW)
EDIT: My mistake, I misnamed the HK glyph as TW, because there was a different-looking TW glyph in v1 Sans, but it was removed and in its place is a similar-looking HK glyph in v2. Will change the title to reflect that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Marcus98T
changed the title
寳 (U+5BF3) has similar looking CN and TW glyphs
寳 (U+5BF3) has similar looking CN and HK glyphs
Jul 26, 2023
Not sure which glyph to keep, probably leaning towards CN, although HK is better designed at the Heavy weight.
Red - CN, Blue - HK (shared with TW)
Also with regards to the 尔 issue (#352), probably might need adjustment to comply with GB standards...?
Also applies to Serif (but not the 尔 part). Leaning towards CN for this one, but HK has better spacing.
Red - CN, Blue - HK (shared with TW)
EDIT: My mistake, I misnamed the HK glyph as TW, because there was a different-looking TW glyph in v1 Sans, but it was removed and in its place is a similar-looking HK glyph in v2. Will change the title to reflect that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: