-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 605
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REQUEST] improve .tar packaging #358
Comments
1: no real opinion on. 2: How would this benefit or help the project or end users when using the GitHub release management system? I don't think it's needed when the api can provide all release specific versioning info needed if that info is required, Whereas using a system like this https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/ it would make sense. |
|
Not sure how or why this changed, but the most recent release (1.2.13, at the time of writing) now contains a folder within the tarballs. I noticed this because it broke my package manager and I was looking for an open or closed issue related to this to understand the reason for the change, but the only thing I found was this issue here, which leads me to believe it was not really intentional? 🤔 I didn't have the time to dig deeper but if someone finds something, I'd be interested in the details. Other than that, I hope it remains stable now. |
@aristocratos sorry, "package manager" was probably not the right term here. It's merely a zsh plugin manager (zinit), which can also be used to download arbitrary artifacts from github release pages. It automatically extracts tarball archives, but in most cases I need to point it to the correct binary path. This path has changed in the recent release, which is how I caught it. But the fix on my end was pretty simple. Thanks for providing the context 👍 |
btop-1.2.7
instead of justbtop
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: