Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

binaries built for linux x86_64 require newer glibc than available on ubuntu 20 #233

Open
kleinschmidt opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

binaries built for linux x86_64 require newer glibc than available on ubuntu 20 #233

kleinschmidt opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation pain point (user) induces confusion, workflow hiccups, or negative reactions in users

Comments

@kleinschmidt
Copy link
Member

kleinschmidt commented Dec 1, 2023 •
edited

The pre-built .so links against glibc 2.32, but Ubuntu has only 2.31.

This means that the jll binaries are not runnable on ubuntu 20. One way to work around this is to use ubunutu 20 images for building the binaries; I'm not sure if there are others though.
@kleinschmidt kleinschmidt added pain point (user) induces confusion, workflow hiccups, or negative reactions in users documentation labels Dec 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation pain point (user) induces confusion, workflow hiccups, or negative reactions in users
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kleinschmidt