Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For April 2018 #63

Closed
mrosseel opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

For April 2018 #63

mrosseel opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mrosseel
Copy link
Member

Basic information

Specify the amount of BSQ you are requesting, and the BSQ address that amount should be paid to:

  • BSQ amount requested: 250
  • BSQ address: B1CZf25cS7KrGJnT8Z5uq8DbUApZLydCkj

Details

Provide links to the work you are requesting compensation for, along with any comments or explanations that will help stakeholders understand its value.

API

Nothing that has been delivered.

Hosting

Monthly costs nodes: 50 / node * 5: 250 BSQ

Running:
1 Price node + bitcoinaverage subscription
1 Seed node
2 Bitcoin full nodes
1 Monitoring node + 1 messaging sync node (on one server)

Roles

Report for this month:
bisq-network/roles#22 (comment)

@cbeams
Copy link
Member

cbeams commented May 8, 2018

Thanks, @mrosseel. Some feedback:

Rather than grouping stuff into a single "Hosting" section directly within your compensation request, please post a monthly update comment on each of the respective roles, e.g.:

Doing things this way maximizes the usefulness of these reports over time. Mostly, people will not go digging through individual compensation requests to see who has been hosting what, or how much they paid to host those things on various hosting providers. But if all operators consistently post monthly report comments on their respective operator role issues, it becomes very easy for operators new and old alike to see who is hosting what where, which hosting providers are overused from a a censorship resistance / network resiliency perspective, which contributors are overloaded / operating too much stuff, to evaluate which hosting providers are delivering the best "bang for the buck", etc.

Also in the "Roles" section of future compensation requests, please name the role as well as linking to the monthly report comment, so that voting stakeholders can see at a glance what roles you played, and which they wish to click on and review. For example:

This was referenced May 8, 2018
@cbeams
Copy link
Member

cbeams commented May 8, 2018

Closing as complete, see #58 (comment).

@cbeams cbeams closed this as completed May 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants