For Cycle 25

[wiz]

Summary

• BSQ requested: 1833
• USD requested: 4400
• BSQ rate: 2.4 USD per BSQ
• Previous compensation request (if applicable): For Cycle 23 #808

Contributions delivered

Title	Team	USD	Link	Notes
Mempool Explorer Operator (2x)	ops*	400	bisq-network/roles#107	mempool.space, mempool.ninja
Bitcoin Node Operator (4x)	ops*	200	bisq-network/roles#67	node100,node140,node210,node220
Bisq Analytics Operator (1x)	ops*	100	bisq-network/roles#88	matomo.bisq.network
Bisq Markets Operator (2x)	ops*	200	bisq-network/roles#9	bisq.markets
Bisq Pricenode Operator (1x)	ops*	100	bisq-network/roles#14	price.bisq.wiz.biz
Bisq Seednode Operator (3x)	ops*	300	bisq-network/roles#15	wizseed3, wizseed7, wizseeds
Bisq Wiki Operator (1x)	ops*	100	bisq-network/roles#92	bisq.wiki
Milestone 2 of Project 41	growth*	3000	bisq-network/projects#41	bisq.markets

Check out the new https://bisq.markets/ website

[MwithM]

Please update the BSQ rate for Cycle 25. #850

[m52go]

Approved for growth 👍

[Emzy]

Approved for ops

[wiz]

Please update the BSQ rate for Cycle 25. #850

This CR is for contributions delivered in Cycle 24, just missed the deadline last month, so the rate is correct. I will do a separate CR for Cycle 25.

[MwithM]

I didn't know these tasks were meant for last cycle. Still, the rate should be the one for this cycle as I understand from: #818 (comment)

As you're benefiting to the DAO by using Cycle 24's rate, I won't fight much about this, but I think it's worth noting it for next cycles.

[wiz]

No these contributions were done in Cycle 24 so I should use the rate for Cycle 24, I'm only submitting it in Cycle 25 due to missing the proposal phase deadline

[sqrrm]

I think all compensation requests should use the current cycle BSQ rate to avoid any gaming of the system, especially since that's the implicit consensus and no other system has been suggested.

I can see the case for ops compensation always using the rate for the cycle they pertain to, but consensus for such a change should be sought first in my opinion.

Other exceptional cases might arise, such as deferring a CR to avoid the whole cycle failing as seen earlier this year.

[wiz]

Yeah ops stuff is monthly so no gaming of the system is possible

[ghost]

Issuance cannot be displayed as there were errors in the comp request

[MwithM]

Close as accepted.