Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should this just be a page on Botwiki.org? #1

Closed
stefanbohacek opened this issue Sep 15, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Should this just be a page on Botwiki.org? #1

stefanbohacek opened this issue Sep 15, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@stefanbohacek
Copy link
Member

Eg. botwiki.org/opensource-bots.

@coleww
Copy link
Contributor

coleww commented Sep 15, 2015

is editing botwiki as easy as a PR?

makes sense if most of the bot codes are on github too

@stefanbohacek
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, you can just do a PR to https://github.com/botwiki/botwiki.org.

The bigger points are:

  • Botwiki.org doesn't allow browsing multiple tags at once (yet), so you can't easily see only opensourced Twitter bots
  • Botwiki.org doesn't necessarily aim to list all online bots, but there should be a list of all open source bots

So I'd say there are three options, really.

  1. Add every single bot to the site and change the Pico tag plugin to allow browsing by multiple tags.
  2. Move the content of this repo to botwiki.org/opensource-bots
  3. Add the more notable bots to Botwiki and maintain a separate list -- this repo (this is the current situation)

I didn't really want to end up with a site like http://botdb.gameology.org/bot-list, which has tons of bots, but is hard to really browse. I am not a huge fan of needing to add some of the open source bots to both Botwiki and to this separate repo.

I guess another option would be to have http://botwiki.org/tag/opensource and this repo could only have the bots that "didn't make the cut"? Honestly, I am not a huge fan of that either, because then you have to search through two different places. Plus some of the source code are not active bots, for example https://github.com/hugovk/word-tools. How would you add that to the site?

@coleww
Copy link
Contributor

coleww commented Sep 15, 2015

yeah, being able to browse like "reply bots" or "image bots" and get code that is workable would be really nice. That could be part of the selection/curation for the main site, is find strong example code for different archetypes of bots, and let people dig deeper if they want to.

also, example code for bots that integrate different APIs/libraries. image-bots that use canvas vs. image-bots that use imagemagick (:O i wonder if this could be done programmatically by looking at the dependencies for the bots listed here?)

@stefanbohacek
Copy link
Member Author

@coleww So I implemented the "multi-tag browsing", eg http://botwiki.org/tag/opensource+ruby now works.

I decided to move all the open-source bots to Botwiki. This will actually work perfectly, because I can, for example, just add https://github.com/hugovk/word-tools as a separate "page" in the "content" folder, it just won't be tagged with "twitterbot", only something like "opensource" and "twitter", "python", etc.

Then I can easily link to "pages" tagged with multiple tags to sort of create a "category".

@stefanbohacek
Copy link
Member Author

I will close this issue once the migration is over, but the answer is: Yes!

@stefanbohacek
Copy link
Member Author

All the updates necessary for the merge are in place. The search is really awesome now, compare this vs this!

@stefanbohacek
Copy link
Member Author

@coleww This is finally starting to come together with https://www.botwiki.org/tag/opensource and https://www.botwiki.org/tag/opensource+twitterbot.

Now we just need more and more bots.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants