Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider combining core convention set builder with provider-specific builder #7466

Closed
ajcvickers opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider combining core convention set builder with provider-specific builder #7466

ajcvickers opened this issue Jan 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
closed-duplicate punted-for-2.0 type-enhancement

Comments

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

After #7457 (one provider) and #7166 (one model) it seems that there may now be no need for two convention set builders anymore.
@rowanmiller rowanmiller added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Jan 31, 2017
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 2.0.0-preview1, 2.0.0 Apr 19, 2017
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: Backlog, 2.0.0 Jun 9, 2017
@ajcvickers ajcvickers assigned AndriySvyryd and unassigned ajcvickers Jun 9, 2017
@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member Author

Duplicate of #10672

@ajcvickers ajcvickers marked this as a duplicate of #10672 Apr 18, 2018
@ajcvickers ajcvickers removed this from the Backlog milestone Apr 18, 2018
@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd removed their assignment Jun 6, 2018
@ajcvickers ajcvickers reopened this Oct 16, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
closed-duplicate punted-for-2.0 type-enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@ajcvickers @smitpatel @rowanmiller @AndriySvyryd