Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Requires" section should not accept Withdrawn EIP #6131

Closed
poojaranjan opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

"Requires" section should not accept Withdrawn EIP #6131

poojaranjan opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement r-ci Relates to the CI r-process Relates to an EIP Process w-stale Waiting on activity

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Change

The current EIPW bot allows Final, Living and Withdrawn EIP to be accepted in the "Requires" section.

While Withdrawn is a terminal status, it may not be an EIP which followed the standardization process and may not be a best proposal to be followed (and/or depend on).

Proposal: Active EIP should not be dependent on a Withdrawn EIP and not accepted in "Requires" section.

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member

+0.5

The only reason I can think of for allowing them is if the EIP was created through the "Old GitHub issue -> withdrawn EIP" pathway (which was made specifically so that those EIPs could be depended on).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2023

There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-stale Waiting on activity label Apr 4, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement r-ci Relates to the CI r-process Relates to an EIP Process w-stale Waiting on activity
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@poojaranjan @Pandapip1 and others