Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can use more of a frame derived clustering with multiple synsets than just deleting the synsets entirely #2

Open
frankier opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@frankier
Copy link
Owner

E.G. if we have

laskea.02,00948071-v
laskea.02,00712556-v
laskea.02,02731632-v
laskea.02,00685081-v
laskea.03,02645839-v
laskea.03,02731632-v
laskea.03,00685081-v
laskea.03,00950431-v
laskea.06,01938426-v

we get a valid clustering by deleting the duplicates as we do now

laskea.02,00948071-v
laskea.02,00712556-v
laskea.03,02645839-v
laskea.03,00950431-v
laskea.06,01938426-v

but we could get an additional clustering by deleting the rest of the contents of the affected clusters and merging them

laskea.02or03,02731632-v
laskea.02or03,00685081-v
laskea.06,01938426-v

or is a more principled approach could be to take all possible choices of cluster for each duplicated synset, convert to graphs and find + remove contradictions, then find cliques. I think this is a bit different since it might refuse to say whether 02731632-v and 00685081-v are in the same cluster so would generate two clusterings

laskea.02or03,02731632-v
laskea.06,01938426-v

and

laskea.02or03,00685081-v
laskea.06,01938426-v

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant