Add RangeMap.mergeCoalescing

[perceptron8]

Please consider addition of RangeMap.mergeCoalescing analogous to RangeMap.putCoalescing. It would be a great complement of RangeMap.merge.

I wish that you had choosen one-off coalesce operation rather than mutating one (see #2665), as it would be helpful in this use case as well.

[perceptron8]

I don't expect this comment to move things forward (quite the opposite probably?), but I'll leave it here as a memo anyway.

Although it's rather clear that
[[0..1)=1, [1..2)=0, [2..3)=1].mergeCoalescing([1..2), 1, (a, b) -> a + b)
should return
[0, 3) = 1
it's not clear at all whether
[[0..1)=1, [1..2)=0, [2..3)=0, [3..4)=0, [4..5)=1].mergeCoalescing([1..4), 1, (a, b) -> a + b)
should return
[[0..2)=1, [2..3)=1, [3..5)=1]
or
[[0..5)=1].

You've probably discovered this and much more similar flaws long time ago.

Surprisingly, I believe this seems to be an argument in favor of RangeMaps.coalesced
(#2665 (comment)).