Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Re-order, revise, review, and refactor Mimir documentation #732

Closed
53 tasks done
osg-grafana opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed
53 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
type/docs Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@osg-grafana
Copy link
Contributor

osg-grafana commented Jan 12, 2022

To see accurate status information about document development, see the Grafana Labs org-wide project #120.

Co-ordinate any changes to this list that follows with Jack and Ursula.

Refactor all Mimir documentation based on internal information architecture project underway by Docs Squad.

Thanks, @jdbaldry, for the collaboration on this list:

Proposed structure for technical documentation


To be re-ordered

Add diagrams

Terminology cleanup

@osg-grafana osg-grafana added the type/docs Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 12, 2022
@osg-grafana osg-grafana self-assigned this Jan 12, 2022
@jdbaldry
Copy link
Member

  1. Propose high level topics to the Docs squad (e.g. Installing with Kubernetes, Overview of microservices, etc.)
  2. Prioritize and order topics
  3. Transform Cortex documentation into Mimir documentation
    • Ensure that references to chunks are removed
    • Ensure that project governance is replaced with Grafana governance
    • Vet API reference documentation and Docs: Refactor API documentation #734
    • Replace architecture diagram with something simpler. Possibly just re-use blocks storage architecture.
    • Write each article, and have it approved the by Docs squad.

@jdbaldry
Copy link
Member

jdbaldry commented Feb 2, 2022

We have a number of operational tools in the repository (mimirtool, query-auditor, query-tee). Would a tools section make sense?

@osg-grafana
Copy link
Contributor Author

We have a number of operational tools in the repository (mimirtool, query-auditor, query-tee). Would a tools section make sense?

Let's introduce those tools within the contexts that make sense, so that we remain goal-oriented.

@jdbaldry jdbaldry pinned this issue Feb 3, 2022
@jdbaldry
Copy link
Member

jdbaldry commented Feb 3, 2022

More areas for consideration. We have a bunch of technical components that are common to multiple services:

Originally noted in #1017 (review)

@osg-grafana
Copy link
Contributor Author

osg-grafana commented Feb 4, 2022

We have a number of operational tools in the repository (mimirtool, query-auditor, query-tee). Would a tools section make sense?

Let's introduce those tools within the contexts that make sense, so that we remain goal-oriented.

On second thought and for more easily distributing documentation work, I am creating a tools/ subdirectory to house these. See #1030

@osg-grafana osg-grafana changed the title Docs: Refactor Mimir documentation Docs: Re-order, revise, review, and refactor Mimir documentation Feb 9, 2022
@osg-grafana
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jdbaldry and @osg-grafana have closed this issue by either opening up subsequent (smaller) issues or marked completed work done.

@osg-grafana
Copy link
Contributor Author

@grafana/mimir-maintainers and the @grafana/docs-squad, thank you all for incredible work. Superb all around!

@jdbaldry jdbaldry unpinned this issue Apr 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/docs Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants