-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What is the license? #157
Comments
I think using multiple licenses in the same repo would just create a mess. To me it's implicit that the project is MIT - since it was borne out of the html5boilerplate project which is also MIT. |
HTML5 Boilerplate was Unlicense before it switched to MIT (h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1139). I think MIT is the best choice for this project too. |
@drublic thanks for the reference. There is an interesting discussion about CC0 and other licenses in this thread. Since CC0 is no longer considered for inclusion by OSI, the arguments in favor of MIT in the original discussion still hold. |
Don't be too hasty in dismissing the public domain, in case the public domain is what you'd really like to do. As I posted in h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1139 just now: For the record, it should be noted that Lawrence Rosen, author of the quoted 2002 article and former general counsel and secretary of the Open Source Initiative (OSI), last year recanted his previous views on public domain software:
See D. J. Bernstein's public domain information page at http://cr.yp.to/publicdomain.html for more particulars. Both Creative Commons and the Free Software Foundation already recognize both CC0 and the Unlicense as valid and compatible public domain dedications. As you can see from a simple GitHub search for the Unlicense, there's quite a lot of public domain adoption going on here at an everyday basis. If you should feel so inclined, by all means feel free to join the "fire hose". |
People like the MIT licence as it 'appears' to say, do what you like with it, but its at your own risk. |
To clarify conditions for reuse of configurations published in this project, either as is or modified, a license should be included.
I suggest:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: