Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PractitionerRole: enrich PractitionerRole.code to align to AU Base & AU Core #22

Open
dt-r opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@dt-r
Copy link
Contributor

dt-r commented Apr 10, 2024

Services Australia provided PractitionerRoles come from ANZSCO which is allowed, but the coding preferred in AU Base & AU Core is from https://healthterminologies.gov.au/fhir/ValueSet/practitioner-role-1.

Add a 2nd coding from https://healthterminologies.gov.au/fhir/ValueSet/practitioner-role-1

@heathfrankel
Copy link
Collaborator

Ideally we would a full conceptMap of the ANZSCO codes for the SA data and implement these for all SA data, but at this time these records would be rejected by the SParked Smile CDR use to the outstanding multiple codings terminology validation error.
For now I have manually applied a few of these so that they will exist in the test data repo, but they will not get uploaded to the server.
For this reason I have not applied this to any of the PractitionerRoles used in other resources.
To demonstrate the use of the practitioner-role binding, I have one PractitionerRole, which is not derived from SA data and as such has no identifiers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants