Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ipfs should default to CIDv1 #9494

Closed
3 tasks done
rlaferla opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

ipfs should default to CIDv1 #9494

rlaferla opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature

Comments

@rlaferla
Copy link

Checklist

  • My issue is specific & actionable.
  • I am not suggesting a protocol enhancement.
  • I have searched on the issue tracker for my issue.

Description

ipfs should default to CIDv1 (multibase)

"If you can't decide between CIDv0 and CIDv1, consider choosing CIDv1 for your new project and opt in by passing a version flag (ipfs add --cid-version 1). This is more future-proof and safe for use in browser contexts.

The IPFS project will switch to CIDv1 as the new default in the near future.

#"
@rlaferla rlaferla added the kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature label Dec 12, 2022
@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Dec 13, 2022

Tracked in #4143.

@lidel lidel closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lidel @rlaferla