Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pod not supported on Fargate: invalid SecurityContext fields: Privileged #1329

Open
anthosz opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@anthosz
Copy link

anthosz commented Apr 26, 2024

/kind bug

What happened?
Unable to use fargate for the efs-csi-controller:

│   Warning  FailedScheduling  11m   fargate-scheduler  Pod not supported on Fargate: invalid SecurityContext fields: Privileged                                                            │

What you expected to happen?
The pod spawn on fargate

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
Create a fargate profile
Install the latest helm chart version of efs-csi-driver: 3.0.1

Environment

  • Kubernetes version (use kubectl version): 1.29 (EKS)
  • Driver version: v2.0.1
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Apr 26, 2024
@anthosz
Copy link
Author

anthosz commented Apr 29, 2024

Probably related to #1100

@anthosz
Copy link
Author

anthosz commented Apr 29, 2024

Workaround found:
Due to the fact deleteAccessPointRootDir is set to false by default, containerSecurityContext.privileged was set to false (seems only used by deleteAccessPointRootDir).

To check if default values.yaml can be aligned (both to true or both to false) in addition of this issue

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 28, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants