Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve nfd-gc on NodeResourceTopology objects #1586

Open
marquiz opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1700
Open

Improve nfd-gc on NodeResourceTopology objects #1586

marquiz opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1700
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor

marquiz commented Feb 14, 2024

What would you like to be added:

We could possibly improve the behavior of nfd-gc by removing stale NRT objects (whose creator pod does not exist anymore). The ownerReference field shouldn't be used as that creates warnings (see k8s garbage-collection). We could use an nfd-specific annotation (like nfd.node.kubernetes.io/owner-pod: <namespace>/<pod-uuid>). The nfd-gc would delete the object if the pod doesn't exist. Possibly acting only if <namespace> is the same where nfd-gc itself is running (so that it doesn't need cluster-wide access to get/list all pods in all namespaces).

This would be a separate improvement in addiotion to #1551 (which didn't play out quite as I initially thought).

Why is this needed:

Better management of NRT objects. Potentially fewer stale objects in the cluster.

@marquiz marquiz added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Feb 14, 2024
@ozhuraki ozhuraki linked a pull request May 6, 2024 that will close this issue
@ozhuraki
Copy link
Contributor

ozhuraki commented May 6, 2024

/assign @ozhuraki

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 4, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants