Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Kubernetes to HEAD #70

Closed
luxas opened this issue May 13, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Update Kubernetes to HEAD #70

luxas opened this issue May 13, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented May 13, 2016

@dlorenc you mentioned you were working on this.

Good to know, as I just had been thinking about doing it too :)
Assigning that to you then.

@luxas luxas added this to the 0.1 Release milestone May 13, 2016
@luxas
Copy link
Member Author

luxas commented May 13, 2016

Or wait... Do we want to update to latest alpha release of Kubernetes instead?

@ethernetdan
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #33

@dlorenc
Copy link
Contributor

dlorenc commented May 13, 2016

I'm currently stuck on this. My branch is here: https://github.com/dlorenc/minikube/tree/updatek8s

I got godeps to resolve, but I can't build. I get:

k8s.io/minikube/vendor/github.com/google/cadvisor/container/rkt

vendor/github.com/google/cadvisor/container/rkt/client.go:58: cannot use apisvcConn (type *"k8s.io/minikube/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc".ClientConn) as type *"google.golang.org/grpc".ClientConn in argument to v1alpha.NewPublicAPIClient

k8s.io/minikube/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/rkt

vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/rkt/rkt.go:194: cannot use apisvcConn (type *"k8s.io/minikube/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc".ClientConn) as type *"google.golang.org/grpc".ClientConn in argument to v1alpha.NewPublicAPIClient

Anyone have any ideas?

@luxas luxas changed the title Update Kubernetes to v1.2.4 Update Kubernetes to HEAD May 14, 2016
@dlorenc
Copy link
Contributor

dlorenc commented May 14, 2016

Fixed with #74. We should come up with a repeatable way to do this eventually, but that can come later.

@dlorenc dlorenc closed this as completed May 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants