Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code: better variable names #118

Open
armfazh opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

code: better variable names #118

armfazh opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@armfazh
Copy link

armfazh commented Oct 8, 2021

it is noisy to get variables named in binary _100 or _101.
Better to follow a standard rule, such as i4 or any other counter in decimal or hex.
or at least, allow the user to specify the format desired.

@armfazh armfazh changed the title better variable names code: better variable names Oct 8, 2021
@mmcloughlin
Copy link
Owner

Yeah I chose that to match https://briansmith.org/ecc-inversion-addition-chains-01. But yes it's not the best for code generation. I think your request could be covered under #94.

How did you generate code from the output? By hand?

@armfazh
Copy link
Author

armfazh commented Oct 9, 2021

manually, it was a tedious task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants