You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The results of recent simulation studies suggest that the implemented TMLE of the PM for two-phase sampling DGPs is inconsistent. This is likely due to over-aggressive tilting procedures in est_tml(). Possible fixes are:
Removing the tilting procedure for the (known) two-phase sampling weights
Reducing the number of permitted iterations in the TMLE tilting procedures by reducing the default value of max_iter in est_tml()
Reducing the maximum step size permitted by the TMLE tilting procedures by reducing the default value of tiltmod_tol in est_tml()
These fixes will be investigated, and their impact on the simulation results will be reported here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In addition to the fixes considered above, the two-phase sampling weights were included in all nuisance parameter estimation procedures with the exception the propensity score. These changes improved the performance of the proportion mediated in all but DGPs where a quarter or less of controls were sampled in the second phase.
The results of recent simulation studies suggest that the implemented TMLE of the PM for two-phase sampling DGPs is inconsistent. This is likely due to over-aggressive tilting procedures in
est_tml()
. Possible fixes are:max_iter
inest_tml()
tiltmod_tol
inest_tml()
These fixes will be investigated, and their impact on the simulation results will be reported here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: