Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Creating "this week in core" series #148

Closed
refack opened this issue Oct 18, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Creating "this week in core" series #148

refack opened this issue Oct 18, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 18, 2017

I guess this was re-triggered in CollabSummit
image
https://twitter.com/addaleax/status/918347360916434944 which was quickly followed with

Since I'm not a big 140 fan, I started thinking about alternatives, and the "Last week in node WG" series came to mind ( @bnb ).
We could create a very simple format based on short blurbs written by the last week's active authors* (opt-in of course).

I'm willing to take charge of pinging the authors and curating the responses, but I'd be happy if there was someone else willing edit (and be a backup).


* author activity by github
image

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Dec 21, 2017

@refack do you think this is a "good first issue"? 🤔

@dshaw
Copy link
Contributor

dshaw commented Dec 21, 2017

For the @nodejs/evangelism WG?

@refack Where do you think this content would get published to?

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Apr 23, 2018

Unfortunately we haven't seen any progress on this - going to close for now, but feel free to re-open if there's progress to be made! 😄

@bnb bnb closed this as completed Apr 23, 2018
@codeekage
Copy link
Contributor

codeekage commented Jan 25, 2019

Hey 👋, can this be removed from the list of "In Need of Champion" or reopened for discussions?

@keywordnew
Copy link
Contributor

There's the new Working Group Update blog series that looks somewhat similar: #435.

@larson-carter
Copy link
Member

@bnb Same here too, can we continue discussions on this?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants