Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the XML markup description of the resource record with namespace #27

Open
ACz-UniBi opened this issue Feb 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
v4.1 candidate for v4.1

Comments

@ACz-UniBi
Copy link
Member

Dear,

in the Application Profile page ( https://github.com/openaire/guidelines-literature-repositories/blob/master/docs/application_profile.rst ) , there is an example snippet:

   <resource xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4"
     xmlns="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/"
     xsi:schemaLocation="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/ https://www.openaire.eu/schema/repo-lit/4.0/openaire.xsd">

Could it improve with the oaire - namespace because some node elements use this namespace explicitly, like

   <oaire:resource xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4"
     xmlns:oaire="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/"
     xsi:schemaLocation="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/ https://www.openaire.eu/schema/repo-lit/4.0/openaire.xsd">

Thanks in advance,
Andreas

@ACz-UniBi ACz-UniBi added the v4.1 candidate for v4.1 label Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
v4.1 candidate for v4.1
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant