Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can openIM obtain the storage status of files in minio? #2545

Open
daoshenjay opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Can openIM obtain the storage status of files in minio? #2545

daoshenjay opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@daoshenjay
Copy link

What would you like to share?

当给minio设置了生命周期规则后,minio中的文件如果被删了,openim server是否可以获取到相关信息,并给文件消息设置为过期。或者有没有其他方法,可以让用户自行判断文件消息中的文件是否还存在,从而给用户展示是否过期。

Additional information

No response

@daoshenjay daoshenjay added the other Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Aug 22, 2024
@OpenIM-Robot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


What would you like to share?

After setting life cycle rules for minio, if the file in minio is deleted, can the openim server obtain the relevant information and set the file message to expire? Or is there any other method that allows users to determine whether the file in the file message still exists, so as to show the user whether it has expired.

Additional information

No response

@OpenIM-Robot OpenIM-Robot changed the title openIM是否可以获取文件在minio中的存储状态 Can openIM obtain the storage status of files in minio? Aug 22, 2024
@FGadvancer FGadvancer added feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed other Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants