Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Star tree] Handle 'unsigned long' as part of star tree #15231

Open
bharath-techie opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Star tree] Handle 'unsigned long' as part of star tree #15231

bharath-techie opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Indexing:Performance

Comments

@bharath-techie
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

Unsigned long in number field is stored as Java.Long when we store as part of doc values and as part of star tree node.

So when unsigned long is > Long.maxValue , the values become negative and hence we need to handle unsigned long comparison separately.

Describe the solution you'd like

We can use Long.compareUnsigned(long, long) as part of dimension sorting.

We also need to handle min , max comparisons as part of aggregations.

Related component

Indexing:Performance

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@bharath-techie bharath-techie added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Indexing:Performance labels Aug 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Indexing:Performance
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants