Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Remote Store] Add index level setting to enable/disable remote store #3141

Closed
sachinpkale opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

[Remote Store] Add index level setting to enable/disable remote store #3141

sachinpkale opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
distributed framework enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework

Comments

@sachinpkale
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As explained in V1 scope of remote store, uploading translog and segments to remote store will be at index level and can be provided while creating the index.
@sachinpkale sachinpkale added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels May 3, 2022
@sachinpkale sachinpkale mentioned this issue May 3, 2022
Open
57 tasks
@kartg kartg added distributed framework Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework and removed untriaged labels May 3, 2022
@sachinpkale
Copy link
Member Author

Initial implementation is added as a part of commit: sachinpkale@279e2b1. Adding tests and creating PR with these changes.

@sachinpkale sachinpkale mentioned this issue May 9, 2022
Merged
5 tasks
@sachinpkale
Copy link
Member Author

PR link: #3243

@sachinpkale
Copy link
Member Author

The current setting added as a part of #3243 need to be changed once we provide more granular settings. Reference: #3243 (comment)

We need to finalize following:

  • Separate controls for segment and translog
  • Do we still need a parent setting for overall remote store feature?
  • Would separate controls be dynamic/final?

This was referenced May 27, 2022
Closed
Merged
@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2022
Closed
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
distributed framework enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sachinpkale @kartg