Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

deribit: L1 labels for options have too little precision, y-range oddness.. #480

Open
2 tasks
goodboy opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

deribit: L1 labels for options have too little precision, y-range oddness.. #480

goodboy opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
data-layer real-time and historical data processing and storage UI

Comments

@goodboy
Copy link
Contributor

goodboy commented Mar 3, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Was trying to do some more thorough testing as part of #471 and discovered that,

  • the precision for opts l1 queue sizes is off (seems to be rounded to zero decimals?):
    screenshot-2023-03-03_18-05-45

  • also, there's a strange auto-y-ranging bug where resetting the chart with .default_view() won't size nicely around the last price line (particularly when there has been no recent 1s OHLC history) and it seems to mostly trigger on panning after fixing the issue manually by zooming on the y-axis?

deribit_opts_yrange_borked_flat_line_on_1s_2023-03-03.18-09.mp4
@goodboy goodboy added data-layer real-time and historical data processing and storage UI viz labels Mar 3, 2023
@goodboy goodboy changed the title deribi: L1 labels for options have too little precision, y-range oddness.. deribit: L1 labels for options have too little precision, y-range oddness.. Mar 3, 2023
@goodboy goodboy removed the viz label Mar 23, 2023
@goodboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

goodboy commented Apr 2, 2023

Likely going to relate to mega-work in #489.

The move to our more simplified MktPair should help alleviate this.

@guilledk just a ping for you to realize that when/if this backend gets rebased we'll likely need to work through these issues in detail.

@goodboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

goodboy commented Jun 7, 2023

FYI this may have been fixed by #518 but i can't verify since need:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
data-layer real-time and historical data processing and storage UI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@goodboy