You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Elephant foot compensation not being able to reduce below 2 perimeter widths is constraining.
Describe the solution you'd like
Removal or override for this behavior.
Describe how it would work
Revert the limitation introduced in 2.2.0 or add checkbox for the logic. With the consideration that #1757 (comment) (<the comment) does not happen; hopefully, as supermerill says, it was just a thin wall problem.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Limiting to a single line is acceptable.
Additional context
I would make the point that with the inclusion of arachne this behavior should be opened back up. Consolidating to a single line is useful sometimes and arachne can make it wider to split the difference.
Personally, I don't like the limitation and prefer to look for these problems on my own, though I suppose most others would not.
Moreover, this limitation was never forced on normal XY compensation and thus seems arbitrary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Elephant foot compensation not being able to reduce below 2 perimeter widths is constraining.
Describe the solution you'd like
Removal or override for this behavior.
Describe how it would work
Revert the limitation introduced in 2.2.0 or add checkbox for the logic. With the consideration that #1757 (comment) (<the comment) does not happen; hopefully, as supermerill says, it was just a thin wall problem.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Limiting to a single line is acceptable.
Additional context
I would make the point that with the inclusion of arachne this behavior should be opened back up. Consolidating to a single line is useful sometimes and arachne can make it wider to split the difference.
Personally, I don't like the limitation and prefer to look for these problems on my own, though I suppose most others would not.
Moreover, this limitation was never forced on normal XY compensation and thus seems arbitrary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: