Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare with PulseFoodInnovation #21

Open
wvengen opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Compare with PulseFoodInnovation #21

wvengen opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
validation Validating the software with external sources, and the like

Comments

@wvengen
Copy link
Member

wvengen commented Jul 21, 2023

In 2022 Data in Brief had an article about parsing ingredients, including the data of product ingredient lists from various countries. It contains barcodes, ingredient listings and parsed ingredients.

It would be useful to compare the two parsers of this project, and see how they compare to the dataset.

@wvengen wvengen added the validation Validating the software with external sources, and the like label Jul 21, 2023
@wvengen
Copy link
Member Author

wvengen commented May 31, 2024

The journal article Packaged foods with pulse ingredients in Europe: A dataset of text-mined product formulations references this dataset, and actually mentions this project. Their code is available at https://github.com/Pythrix/FOODCOP. It is a bit disappointing that the benchmark is confined to their parser only, not this one. Would be nice to compare the two parsers at some point.

It also mentions the project https://github.com/irockel/ingredients_parser, which is more oriented to image recognition, and has very basic text processing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
validation Validating the software with external sources, and the like
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant