Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Admin API endpoints for forcefully aborting partition movements on cluster/node #5782

Open
ztlpn opened this issue Aug 1, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/redpanda kind/enhance New feature or request

Comments

@ztlpn
Copy link
Contributor

ztlpn commented Aug 1, 2022

JIRA Link: CORE-986

@piyushredpanda
Copy link
Contributor

This can be closed/duped, @ztlpn ?

@ztlpn ztlpn closed this as completed Sep 12, 2022
@ztlpn
Copy link
Contributor Author

ztlpn commented Sep 12, 2022

@piyushredpanda actually no, we have the safe cancellation variants, but forceful abort variants haven't been implemented

@ztlpn ztlpn reopened this Sep 12, 2022
@piyushredpanda
Copy link
Contributor

I see, can we link this to a relevant epic, @ztlpn / @mmedenjak ? Perhaps every project should have a epic of must-haves and then later an epic of fast-follows/good-to-haves that inevitably either show up too late for release or get pushed out from the release but stuff we really should be spending time on.

@mmaslankaprv
Copy link
Member

Do we really need a batch force cancellation ? The force cancellation is an unsafe operation and in general it should be avoided, maybe the per partition API we have currently is enough ?

@piyushredpanda
Copy link
Contributor

@mmaslankaprv: Please chat with Matt and Alexey, and then depending on your conclusion we can close this out?

@mmedenjak
Copy link
Contributor

mmedenjak commented Sep 25, 2022

Perhaps every project should have a epic of must-haves and then later an epic of fast-follows/good-to-haves that inevitably either show up too late for release or get pushed out from the release but stuff we really should be spending time on.

Right now it's still a part of https://github.com/redpanda-data/core-internal/issues/48. The epic might be closed, but it may contain open issues and PRs (confusing, I know). Not sure if I'd have a follow-up epic for every epic. For 22.3 we have this one as a catch-all - https://github.com/redpanda-data/core-internal/issues/64. The problem I'd tackle next is figuring out how we'd best groom the backlog of issues in so that issues like this one surface once someone has extra time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/redpanda kind/enhance New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants