Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code of Conduct #102

Closed
hakavlad opened this issue Dec 15, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Code of Conduct #102

hakavlad opened this issue Dec 15, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@hakavlad
Copy link
Contributor

I've noticed you don't have a CoC yet. Care to accept one? I would suggest accepting NCoC CoC, believe me it's an incredible CoC, everyone should accept it or at least try it. You would be amazed how great of a CoC it is.

Here is how you can accept a CoC: https://help.github.com/articles/adding-a-code-of-conduct-to-your-project/

Please do, okay?

@rfjakob
Copy link
Owner

rfjakob commented Dec 15, 2018

Haha, no, the NCoC seems to be missing the "don't be an asshole" part that I find pretty important

@rfjakob rfjakob closed this as completed Dec 15, 2018
@hakavlad
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's dangerous to live without a coc

Why?

@rfjakob
Copy link
Owner

rfjakob commented Dec 22, 2018

Indeed the contributor covenant coc looks pretty good to me. And the list of adopters is impressive - the linux kernel has added it in september.

@hakavlad
Copy link
Contributor Author

hakavlad commented Dec 22, 2018

dangerous to live without a coc

hurt someone's feelings

building a safe space

SJW bingo!

@rfjakob
Copy link
Owner

rfjakob commented Dec 28, 2018

Will decide the week after new year's eve, thanks for the reminder.

@rfjakob rfjakob reopened this Jan 1, 2019
@rfjakob rfjakob closed this as completed in 0a6e222 Jan 1, 2019
@rfjakob
Copy link
Owner

rfjakob commented Jan 1, 2019

Added the contributor covenant coc and linked it in the changelog, thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@rfjakob @hakavlad and others