Questions on numerical results

[MouseHu]

Hi,
When reading the paper and checking issue #1 , I found that the numerical results in Appendix C&F are inconsistent with the provided expert scores. For example, in Figure 7, ICM with 10^5 pretraining on walker_walk has about 50% normalized score, and the numerical result in Table 5 is (302+-45). As the expert score is 971 mentioned in #1 , this is equivalent to about 31% normalized score. Did I miss something here? Also, it seems that the score for pretraining methods, in general, cannot compete with SOTA methods like CURL and DrQ, which do not require any pretraining. Is there any explanation for this? Thanks!