🐛 different reformatting for comments in default switch clause

[Conaclos]

Environment information

Rome v11.0.0-nightly.97e48b4

What happened?

The following code:

switch(5){default: // comment5
// comment5a
bar();//comment5b
break;
}

is formatted to:

switch (5) {
	default: // comment5
	//comment5b
		// comment5a
		bar();
		break;
}

is itself formatted to:

switch (5) {
	default: // comment5
		//comment5b
		// comment5a
		bar();
		break;
}

This triggers a reformat failure on cargo test.

Note that comments are also reordered: //comment5b should come after // comment5a.

EDIT: this does not affect switch case clauses.

Expected result

Reformatting the code should not change the formatting.

This is blocking #4234.

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow Rome's Code of Conduct

[Conaclos]

Prettier had the same issue in its previous version (see on the rome playground).

It is now fixed in its current version.