Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Currently Export to App is Not Supported #8

Closed
monkstone opened this issue Jul 26, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Currently Export to App is Not Supported #8

monkstone opened this issue Jul 26, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@monkstone
Copy link
Member

The original ruby-processing supported export of OS specific applications, it would seem saner to create a cross-platform exporter using say warbler.
@stevekinney, @fluxusfrequency, @poqudrof have you any experience?

@poqudrof
Copy link
Member

Nope I don't know this, it looks really nice though.

@dfl
Copy link

dfl commented Apr 30, 2016

I'm trying to package a basic sketch (jwishy.rb) with warbler as an example. will let you know if/when I get it working. https://github.com/dfl/jruby_art-warbler-example

@monkstone
Copy link
Member Author

monkstone commented May 9, 2016

@dfl I guess the ideal would be use maven to serve up jar artifacts (well specifically processing), just found some kind person has made processing-3.0.2 artefacts available from maven (probably @poqudrof ) I can't see Ben Fry doing it. Of course they've only gone and bumped up to 3.1 as of yesterday.

@poqudrof
Copy link
Member

poqudrof commented May 9, 2016

Yes I made it available, I was away for a while sorry for the delay for the jars !
I did not see the 3.1, I will make it today so it might be available tomorrow.
-- Update
It is available http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cprocessing

@monkstone
Copy link
Member Author

@poqudrof @dfl this will likely impact application export of JRubyArt / propane on macOS although the jruby guys might find a way round it processing/processing#4705

@monkstone
Copy link
Member Author

@poqudrof @dfl we should follow progress in this shoes4 issue shoes/shoes4#1415, they have a more compelling need to solve the problem.

@monkstone
Copy link
Member Author

Seem irrelevant now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants