Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

incorrectly branching into cheatcode call during cse summarization #822

Open
ovatman opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

incorrectly branching into cheatcode call during cse summarization #822

ovatman opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working cse

Comments

@ovatman
Copy link
Contributor

ovatman commented Sep 19, 2024

When applying cse kontrol produces a #cheatcode_call branch due to a possible misinterpretation of a symoblic variable when applying #checkCall.
To reproduce, perform the following, using kontrol 1.0.25

  1. Use the UniswapV2 variant from here; a part of the Pi^2 solidity semantic development project. This file contains multiple contracts.
  2. Initialize a foundry project and place the test contract in a separate test directory. In my case all the other contracts reside in a single file under src and the uniswapV2SwapTest was under test
  3. forge test and kontrol build
  4. We will try to get a summary of the uniswapV2Pair.sync() function so run kontrol prove --match-test 'uniswapV2Pair.sync()' --break-on-calls --cse

Should fail as follows:

  Failure reason:
    Matching failed.
    The following cells failed matching individually (antecedent #Implies consequent):
    K_CELL: #cheatcode_error selector ( "balanceOf(address)" ) #buf ( 32 , C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int )
    ~> #cheatcode_return 128 32
    ~> #pc [ CALL ]
    ~> #execute #Implies #halt ~> .K
    ~> CONTINUATION:K
  1. After failure, issue kontrol show 'uniswapV2Pair.sync()'

Following is the related part from kcfg

├─ 5
│   k: #checkCall C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int 0 ~> #call C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int C_UNISWAPV2P ...
│   pc: 2313
│   callDepth: CALLDEPTH_CELL:Int
│   statusCode: STATUSCODE:StatusCode
│   src: src/UniswapV2Swap.sol:290:290
│   method: src%uniswapV2Pair.sync()
┃
┃ (1 step)
┣━━┓
┃  │
┃  ├─ 6
┃  │   k: #cheatcode_call selector ( "balanceOf(address)" ) #buf ( 32 , C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID ...
┃  │   pc: 2313
┃  │   callDepth: CALLDEPTH_CELL:Int
┃  │   statusCode: STATUSCODE:StatusCode
┃  │   src: src/UniswapV2Swap.sol:290:290
┃  │   method: src%uniswapV2Pair.sync()
┃  │
┃  │  (1 step)
┃  └─ 8 (stuck, leaf)
┃      k: #cheatcode_error selector ( "balanceOf(address)" ) #buf ( 32 , C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_I ...
┃      pc: 2313
┃      callDepth: CALLDEPTH_CELL:Int
┃      statusCode: CHEATCODE_UNIMPLEMENTED
┃      src: src/UniswapV2Swap.sol:290:290
┃      method: src%uniswapV2Pair.sync()
@ovatman ovatman added bug Something isn't working cse labels Sep 19, 2024
@PetarMax
Copy link
Contributor

This is strange, because (I think) this means that C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID does not have the constraint that it's different from the cheatcode account address. We normally put this constraint in. @ovatman, what is the full configuration you see in node 5?

@ovatman
Copy link
Contributor Author

ovatman commented Sep 20, 2024

@PetarMax I don't have this constraint. Here's the full conf of node 5 (cropping some parts for brevity):

( <generatedTop>
  <foundry>
    <kevm>
      <k>
        #checkCall C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int 0
        ~> #call C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int 0 0 b"p\xa0\x821" +Bytes #buf ( 32 , C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int ) false
        ~> #return 128 32
        ~> #pc [ CALL ]
        ~> #execute
        ~> CONTINUATION:K
      </k>
      ...
      <ethereum>
        <evm>
          <callState>
             ...
            <id>
              C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int
            </id>
            <caller>
              CALLER_ID:Int
            </caller>
            <callData>
              b"\xff\xf6\xca\xe9"
            </callData>
            <callValue>
              0
            </callValue>
            <wordStack>
              ( 164 : ( selector ( "balanceOf(address)" ) : ( C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int : ( 3471 : ( 373 : ( selector ( "sync()" ) : .WordStack ) ) ) ) ) )
            </wordStack>
            <localMem>
              b"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x80\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00p\xa0\x821" +Bytes #buf ( 32 , C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int )
            </localMem>
            ...
          </callState>
          <substate>
            <refund>
              0
            </refund>
            <accessedAccounts>
              ACCESSEDACCOUNTS_CELL:Set |Set SetItem ( C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int )
            </accessedAccounts>
            ...
          </substate>
            ...
          </block>
          ...
        </evm>
        <network>
          <accounts>
            ( <account>
              <acctID>
                C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int
              </acctID>
              <balance>
                C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_BAL:Int
              </balance>
              <code>
                src%uniswapV2Pair
              </code>
              <storage>
                ( ( 0 |-> C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int )
                ( ( 1 |-> C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN1_ID:Int )
                C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_STORAGE:Map ) )
              </storage>
              <nonce>
                C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_NONCE:Int
              </nonce>
              ...
            </account>
            ACCOUNTS_REST:AccountCellMap )
          </accounts>
          ...
        </network>
      </ethereum>
      ...
    </kevm>
    <cheatcodes>
      ...
    </cheatcodes>
    <KEVMTracing>
      ...
    </KEVMTracing>
  </foundry>
  ...
</generatedTop>
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int CALLER_ID:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int ORIGIN_ID:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals pow24 <Int NUMBER_CELL:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_BAL:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals NUMBER_CELL:Int <Int pow32 }
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_NONCE:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals 1073741824 <Int TIMESTAMP_CELL:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals TIMESTAMP_CELL:Int <Int 34359738368 }
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals 0 <=Int C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN1_ID:Int }
#And ( { true #Equals C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_NONCE:Int <Int maxUInt64 }
#And ( { true #Equals CALLER_ID:Int <Int pow160 }
#And ( { true #Equals ORIGIN_ID:Int <Int pow160 }
#And ( { true #Equals C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int <Int pow160 }
#And ( { true #Equals C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN0_ID:Int <Int pow160 }
#And ( { true #Equals C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_TOKEN1_ID:Int <Int pow160 }
#And ( { true #Equals C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_BAL:Int <Int pow256 }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool 0 in_keys ( C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_STORAGE:Map ) ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool 1 in_keys ( C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_STORAGE:Map ) ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool CALLER_ID:Int ==Int 645326474426547203313410069153905908525362434349 ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool ORIGIN_ID:Int ==Int 645326474426547203313410069153905908525362434349 ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int ==Int 645326474426547203313410069153905908525362434349 ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool <acctID> C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int </acctID> in_keys ( ACCOUNTS_REST:AccountCellMap ) ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool #range ( 0 < CALLER_ID:Int <= 9 ) ) }
#And ( { true #Equals ( notBool #range ( 0 < ORIGIN_ID:Int <= 9 ) ) }
#And { true #Equals ( notBool #range ( 0 < C_UNISWAPV2PAIR_ID:Int <= 9 ) ) } ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working cse
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants