Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2023. It is now read-only.

0xPkhatri - Implement safeTransfer() instead of transfer() #335

Closed
sherlock-admin opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

0xPkhatri - Implement safeTransfer() instead of transfer() #335

sherlock-admin opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Duplicate A valid issue that is a duplicate of an issue with `Has Duplicates` label Medium A valid Medium severity issue Reward A payout will be made for this issue

Comments

@sherlock-admin
Copy link
Contributor

sherlock-admin commented May 5, 2023

0xPkhatri

medium

Implement safeTransfer() instead of transfer()

Summary

The ERC20.transfer() function returns a Boolean value indicating success, which must be checked for proper execution. Some tokens do not revert if the transfer fails but return false instead.

Vulnerability Detail

Certain non-compliant ERC20 tokens may return false from the transfer and transferFrom function calls, signaling that the transfer has failed. However, if the return value is not checked, the calling contract will not detect the failure, despite the EIP-20 specification requiring a return value check.

function transferERC20(
    IERC20 erc20Contract,
    address to,
    uint256 amount
) external onlyClubOwner {
    erc20Contract.transfer(to, amount);
}

Impact

The protocol or users might experience losses.

Code Snippet

https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-04-footium/blob/main/footium-eth-shareable/contracts/FootiumEscrow.sol#L105-L111

Tool used

Manual Review

Recommendation

It is recommended to use OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 utility, which includes safeTransfer functions that handle the return value check and non-standard-compliant tokens.

https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/master/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol

function transferERC20(
    IERC20 erc20Contract,
    address to,
    uint256 amount
) external onlyClubOwner {
-    erc20Contract.transfer(to, amount);
+    erc20Contract.safeTransfer(to, amount);

}

Duplicate of #86

@github-actions github-actions bot added Medium A valid Medium severity issue Duplicate A valid issue that is a duplicate of an issue with `Has Duplicates` label labels May 10, 2023
@sherlock-admin sherlock-admin added the Reward A payout will be made for this issue label May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Duplicate A valid issue that is a duplicate of an issue with `Has Duplicates` label Medium A valid Medium severity issue Reward A payout will be made for this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant