You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A recent ST4 update introduced kinetic scroll on Linux.
There seems to be no setting to deactivate it. I personally don't like it, and while that is subjective it would be nice to having the option to turn it off.
It seems to break the "scroll_speed" setting. Its value has no effect at all now, if scrolling with a touchpad.
Fyi, I dislike kinetic scroll because it often leads to small jumps when lifting my fingers off the touchpad (T480s). Even if I completely stop the scrolling motion and only then lift my fingers, the view almost always shifts by ~1-3 lines. I think multiple applications have that problem but somehow I notice it most in ST4.
FWIW I'm using Fedora 40 with Gnome 46.4 on Wayland.
Preferred solution
Add setting to deactivate kinetic scroll on Linux
Make scroll_speed have an effect even if kinetic scroll is enabled
Alternatives
Deactivating kinetic scroll could be implemented via "scroll_speed": 0.0. Initially I expected this to do it, but no.
Additional Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem description
A recent ST4 update introduced kinetic scroll on Linux.
"scroll_speed"
setting. Its value has no effect at all now, if scrolling with a touchpad.Fyi, I dislike kinetic scroll because it often leads to small jumps when lifting my fingers off the touchpad (T480s). Even if I completely stop the scrolling motion and only then lift my fingers, the view almost always shifts by ~1-3 lines. I think multiple applications have that problem but somehow I notice it most in ST4.
FWIW I'm using Fedora 40 with Gnome 46.4 on Wayland.
Preferred solution
scroll_speed
have an effect even if kinetic scroll is enabledAlternatives
Deactivating kinetic scroll could be implemented via
"scroll_speed": 0.0
. Initially I expected this to do it, but no.Additional Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: