-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Integrate spec text into ES text with change bars? #92
Comments
Domenic says "use INS and DEL tags". |
@waldemarhorwat, how does this version look to you? @littledan, would it be appropriate to offer the proposal to the committee in this form? I sure would prefer not to have to maintain two sets of proposal text. |
So far, seems like most proposals have proceeded with just an external document, not a diff/PR against the main spec. SharedArrayBuffer has mostly been developed in this form, and I think it's good. ins and del tags are useful when modifying existing internal algorithms or grammar, but I don't know if SAB runs into any of those. The work of integrating directly into the main spec text tends to be done some time after Stage 3. I don't think you need to maintain the PR against the spec--that sounds like a lot of work with all the rebasing. |
Please do not maintain a PR against the spec. Once your spec is stage 4 (or when you're pushing for stage 4) is the appropriate time for producing the spec PR. |
OK, fair enough. I'll consider the matter closed until the proposal advances. |
As a compromise (and because I think it is an improvement) I have -- in selected cases, notably several altered algorithms -- copied a small amount of text from ES262 into the shared memory draft spec and marked the diff from ES262 using INS/DEL tags. I have also identified the base revision of ES262 for that. As it was, the spec was out of sync with current ES262 and was hard to understand. |
In Issue #77 @waldemarhorwat writes:
@domenic @bterlson Does ecmarkup have that kind of functionality?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: