You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've compared two SVG images: one created using the element (31kB) and the other using and elements (76kB).
I don't understand why the SVG image created with is larger (19kB) compared to the image (15kB). What could be causing this discrepancy?
I'm asking this question because I'm writing files with numerous SVG images. I assumed that using a more powerful and compact format like would result in smaller file sizes. Are there any options I could apply to achieve this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sdespont
changed the title
Why do SVG images using <path> elements result in larger file sizes than those using <defs> elements?
Why SVG images using <path> elements create larger file sizes than those using <defs> elements?
May 14, 2024
I've compared two SVG images: one created using the element (31kB) and the other using and elements (76kB).
I don't understand why the SVG image created with is larger (19kB) compared to the image (15kB). What could be causing this discrepancy?
I'm asking this question because I'm writing files with numerous SVG images. I assumed that using a more powerful and compact format like would result in smaller file sizes. Are there any options I could apply to achieve this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: