Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, #12852

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 9, 2021

Conversation

audunn
Copy link
Member

@audunn audunn commented Feb 4, 2021

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Note no SDK's have been released yet for this api verison.

This addresses an issue found after #12388 was merged last night.
Service team had updated the response of Backup Patch (Backups_Update) operation to respond with code 202, this was missing from the swagger. This causes an issue in the Python SDK, tested on locally generated SDK not official release since it has not been released.

We also ask if we can remove the systemData property from netAppAccount that added in PR12388 since that is not in the response yet will be added in API-Version 2021-02-01?

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  • This addresses an issue found after [NetAppFiles] Anf 9085 update swagger rest api to 2020 11 01 #12388 was merged last night (Feb. 4). Service team had updated the response of Backup Patch (Backups_Update) operation to respond with code 202, this was missing from the swagger.
  • We removed name from volumeProperties. Name just was added in this api_version in PR [NetAppFiles] Anf 9085 update swagger rest api to 2020 11 01 #12388 to address a s360 ROUNDTRIP_MISSING_PROPERTY finding where the name property was in the response but not defined in the swagger. However the property was removed from the response by the service team in a recent update so the change was no longer needed.

Note no SDK's have been released yet for this api verison.
2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
- [ ] SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
- [ ] SDK of Python
- [ ] SDK of Java
- [ ] SDK of Js
- [ ] SDK of Go
- [ ] PowerShell
- [ ] CLI
- [ ] Terraform
- [ ] No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Note no SDK's have been released yet for this api verison.

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @audunn Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 4, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Rule Message
    1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
    New: Microsoft.NetApp/stable/2020-11-01/netapp.json#L2203:11
    1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'name' renamed or removed?
    New: Microsoft.NetApp/stable/2020-11-01/netapp.json#L3388:7
    Old: Microsoft.NetApp/stable/2020-11-01/netapp.json#L3378:7
    ️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for LintDiff.

    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 13 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'OperationListResult' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'Operation-display' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'OperationProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'ServiceSpecification' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'MetricSpecification' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'Dimension' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'volumeProperties-exportPolicy' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'volumeProperties-dataProtection' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'volumePatchProperties-exportPolicy' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"netapp/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-netapp-2020-11-01",
    "details":"The schema 'volumePatchProperties-dataProtection' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 4, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 8f29967. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-mgmt-netapp [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added operation BackupsOperations.begin_update
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Volume no longer has parameter name_properties_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation BackupsOperations.update
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 8f29967. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:05 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-netapp"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:05 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:05 INFO autorest --version=3.0.6369 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.16 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/netapp/azure-resourcemanager-netapp --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.netapp   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/netapp/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:52 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:52 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:52 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-netapp
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:52 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:52 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-09 10:53:52 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ReflectionUtils (file:/home/vsts/.m2/repository/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy/3.0.0-beta-2/groovy-3.0.0-beta-2-indy.jar) to method java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toString()
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ReflectionUtils
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
      cmderr	[generate.py] WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-netapp [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-09 10:57:51 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-netapp
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-09 10:57:51 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-09 10:57:51 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-netapp-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-09 10:57:51 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-netapp-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-09 10:57:51 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/12852/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-netapp/azure-resourcemanager-netapp-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-netapp-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-netapp -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-netapp-1.0.0-beta.1.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 8f29967. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-mgmt-netapp [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model NetAppAccountPatch has a new parameter encryption
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Volume has a new parameter encryption_key_source
      info	[Changelog]   - Model NetAppAccount has a new parameter encryption
      info	[Changelog]   - Model NetAppAccount has a new parameter system_data
      info	[Changelog]   - Model BackupPatch has a new parameter failure_reason
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ActiveDirectory has a new parameter ldap_over_tls
      info	[Changelog]   - Model Backup has a new parameter failure_reason
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 8f29967. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
      command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/netapp/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.NetApp [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-resource-manager-schemas succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 8f29967. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	npx n 12
      command	autorest --use=@autorest/azureresourceschema@3.0.92 --version=3.0.6369 --azureresourceschema --multiapi --title=none --pass-thru:subset-reducer --azureresourceschema-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/azure-resource-manager-schemas ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/netapp/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️netapp [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
      cmderr	[resource-manager] node-pre-gyp
      cmderr	[resource-manager] WARN Using request for node-pre-gyp https download
      cmderr	[resource-manager] WARN template-schema-validation-tools@1.0.0 No repository field.
      cmderr	[resource-manager]  optional SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: fsevents@2.1.3 (node_modules/fsevents):
      cmderr	[resource-manager] npm WARN notsup SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: Unsupported platform for fsevents@2.1.3: wanted {"os":"darwin","arch":"any"} (current: {"os":"linux","arch":"x64"})
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 8f29967. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.4.4 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/netapp/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-netapp [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/azureNetAppFilesManagementClient.js → ./dist/arm-netapp.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-netapp.js in 495ms
    ️🔄[Staging] ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @audunn, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @audunn, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @audunn
    Copy link
    Member Author

    audunn commented Feb 4, 2021

    @jianyexi Note this is urgent, and no SDK's have been released yet for this api verison.

    @audunn audunn changed the title [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet) [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet) - no sdk released for this api-version Feb 4, 2021
    @audunn audunn changed the title [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet) - no sdk released for this api-version [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet) Feb 4, 2021
    @jorgecotillo
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Please mark the appropriate checkboxes from ARM API Checklist and Breaking Change Review Checklist without marking them the review cannot proceed.

    @audunn
    Copy link
    Member Author

    audunn commented Feb 4, 2021

    Please mark the appropriate checkboxes from ARM API Checklist and Breaking Change Review Checklist without marking them the review cannot proceed.

    @jorgecotillo done

    @audunn
    Copy link
    Member Author

    audunn commented Feb 8, 2021

    @jorgecotillo can we proceed with this?

    @jianyexi jianyexi added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Feb 9, 2021
    @jianyexi jianyexi added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Feb 9, 2021
    @jianyexi
    Copy link
    Contributor

    jianyexi commented Feb 9, 2021

    As the PR is to fix bug on a new api version added recently and have no customer impact , just approve the breaking change.

    @jianyexi jianyexi merged commit 8f29967 into Azure:master Feb 9, 2021
    This was referenced Feb 9, 2021
    @audunn audunn changed the title [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet) [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, Feb 9, 2021
    iscai-msft added a commit to iscai-msft/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2021
    …into fix_resource_multiapi_submodule
    
    * 'master' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs: (452 commits)
      Dev cost management microsoft.cost management 2020 12 01 preview new (Azure#12259)
      Edit securityContact swagger for 2020-01-01 (Azure#12265)
      [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Insights to add version stable/2020-10-01 (Azure#11579)
      [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Media to add version stable/2020-05-01 (Azure#12681)
      Fix TimeSeriesInsights swagger issues (Azure#12204)
      Fixing error in lastModifiedAt description (Azure#12854)
      Update comment.yml (Azure#12910)
      Fixing RI s360 Flagged corrections in 2019-10-01 version (Azure#12777)
      [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Web to add version stable/2020-10-01 (Azure#11636)
      [Ready For Review] New version 20210101 (Azure#12111)
      Update scheduledQueryRule_API.json (Azure#12895)
      Remove UserAssigned MSI (Azure#12900)
      Update library.json (Azure#12922)
      KeyVault: Feature/update security domain spec (Azure#12863)
      Fixes ExampleId type and incorrect ArmTokenParameter name (Azure#12896)
      Update contract for anomaly detector (Azure#12487)
      [NetAppFiles] Urgent bug fix, backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet) (Azure#12852)
      [AML] Add PipelineEndpoint with version and DataPathAssignments fields in AzureMLExecutePipeline (Azure#12744)
      remove duplicated schema (Azure#12779)
      [Web] Add Swagger for Service Principal (Azure#12780)
      ...
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    …in response yet) (Azure#12852)
    
    * Fix backup response, remove systemData(not in response yet
    
    * Add long running op to backup patch
    
    * systemData
    
    * Remove name from volume properties, removed from service response
    
    * Reference system data from common types
    
    * Reference system data from common types
    
    Co-authored-by: Audunn Baldvinsson <audunn.baldvinsson@netapp.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants