Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add provisioner OID to initial MHSM admins #23929

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2021
Merged

Conversation

heaths
Copy link
Member

@heaths heaths commented Sep 9, 2021

Necessary after Azure/azure-sdk-tools#1983 is merged.

@ghost ghost added the KeyVault label Sep 9, 2021
"provisionerApplicationOid": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "The provisioner OID to grant access to test resources."
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we note that this is used as the admin for any resources that require one?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it necessary. Honestly, adding these descriptions was more for me and future maintainers, for which you can just look where they are used anyway. The description here is still technically accurate, as - as an admin - they do have permissions to do almost anything in the MHSM.

@heaths heaths marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2021 17:44
@heaths heaths merged commit aa88957 into Azure:main Sep 13, 2021
@heaths heaths deleted the test-resources branch September 13, 2021 17:45
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
[PostgreSQL] Allow network property to be updated during PG flexible server update (Azure#23929)

* Allow entwork property to be updated during PG flexible server update

* Updated description to explicitly specify when delegatedSubnetResourceId and privateDnsZoneArmResourceId are required
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants