Integration test #28
Integration test #28
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@csikb has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThis update introduces a comprehensive enhancement to the project's testing and deployment processes, including the addition of integration testing, updates to ESLint configurations, service definitions for Docker environments, and healthcheck modifications. It improves the reliability and maintainability of the codebase by ensuring better testing coverage and more precise service monitoring. Changes
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (14)
- .circleci/config.yml (1 hunks)
- .eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.ci.yml (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (3 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/router/health.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/router/health.test.ts (2 hunks)
- testsInt/global-setup.ts (1 hunks)
- testsInt/graphql.test.ts (1 hunks)
- testsInt/health.test.ts (1 hunks)
- testsInt/ping.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.test.json (1 hunks)
- vitest.int.config.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docker-compose.ci.yml
Additional comments not posted (20)
tsconfig.test.json (1)
5-8: LGTM! The added paths correctly target the new integration test files and configurations.vitest.int.config.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM! The Vitest configuration is appropriately set up for integration testing.testsInt/ping.test.ts (1)
1-17: LGTM! The test for the ping endpoint is correctly implemented and follows best practices.testsInt/health.test.ts (1)
1-17: LGTM! The test for the health endpoint is correctly implemented and follows best practices.src/index.ts (1)
21-21: LGTM! The comment update improves accuracy and clarity.src/router/health.ts (1)
8-25: Consider differentiating the status codes or messages for "no views found" and "cannot connect to database" scenarios to improve error handling and monitoring..eslintrc.json (1)
24-26: LGTM! The ESLint configuration update correctly extends code quality checks to the new integration test files.testsInt/graphql.test.ts (1)
1-40: LGTM! The test for the GraphQL endpoint is correctly implemented and follows best practices.testsInt/global-setup.ts (3)
1-36: Ensure Docker Compose services are correctly named.
19-31: Consider adding error handling for Docker Compose setup failures.To improve robustness, wrap the Docker Compose setup in a try-catch block and log any errors that occur during the setup process. This can help diagnose issues in CI environments.
34-36: LGTM! Proper teardown of Docker Compose environment.docker-compose.yml (3)
14-16: Refine health check command forgraphqlservice.Consider using a more specific endpoint for the health check of the
graphqlservice, if available, to ensure it's fully operational.
25-25: Increase start period forbackendservice health check.Given the dependencies of the
backendservice, consider increasing thestart_periodto allow more time for initialization, reducing the likelihood of premature health check failures.
42-42: LGTM! Bindingdbservice port to127.0.0.1.Binding the
dbservice port to127.0.0.1enhances security by limiting external access..circleci/config.yml (1)
53-56: LGTM! Addition ofIntegration testjob in CircleCI configuration.The addition of the
Integration testjob is well-configured and aligns with the PR objectives to enhance the project's testing framework.tests/router/health.test.ts (3)
1-11: LGTM! Proper mocking ofpostgresquery function.The mocking setup for the
postgresquery function is correctly implemented, facilitating isolated testing of the/healthendpoint.
27-59: Refine test cases for/healthendpoint.Consider adding more granular assertions for the HTTP response headers in the test cases for the
/healthendpoint to ensure correct content type and other relevant headers are being set.
24-62: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [60-67]
LGTM! Test case for
/pingendpoint.The test case for the
/pingendpoint is well-implemented, verifying the expected response.package.json (2)
12-13: LGTM! Addition of integration testing scripts.The new scripts for integration testing (
test:intandtest:int:ci) are correctly added and enhance the project's testing capabilities.
40-62: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [21-59]
Ensure all new dependencies are correctly categorized.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
frontendandbackendservices to improve service monitoring.