Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Ansible Lint Config #11283

Merged

Conversation

Mab879
Copy link
Member

@Mab879 Mab879 commented Nov 16, 2023

Description:

Get the Ansible lint config so that errors are usable.

Rationale:

So that the job passes.

This puts the errors on the warn list that #11266 is trying to fix.

Get the Ansible lint config so that errors are usable.
@Mab879 Mab879 added the Infrastructure Our content build system label Nov 16, 2023
@Mab879 Mab879 added this to the 0.1.71 milestone Nov 16, 2023
Copy link

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

Fedora Environment
Open in Gitpod

Oracle Linux 8 Environment
Open in Gitpod

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 16, 2023

Code Climate has analyzed commit 51126d9 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 58.8%.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link
Collaborator

@vojtapolasek vojtapolasek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the modification. I admit that some of those warnings are worth investigating, but this will unblock our reviews of PR gating.

@vojtapolasek vojtapolasek merged commit b7bd70d into ComplianceAsCode:master Nov 16, 2023
38 checks passed
@Mab879 Mab879 deleted the fix_ansible_lint_20231116 branch November 16, 2023 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Infrastructure Our content build system
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants