-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 684
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cis partitions rules #5749
Cis partitions rules #5749
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
1 similar comment
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Hello @willumpie! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
|
Hi @willumpie. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@willumpie can do a rebase please? We would like to not have all the extra commits in this PR. Makes it very hard to review. |
|
bf05bc8
to
87fdc58
Compare
I merged my fork according the github tutorial. sorry. |
anssi: NT28(R12) | ||
srg: SRG-OS-000368-GPOS-00154 | ||
cis@sle15: 1.1.15 | ||
cis@ubuntu1804: 1.1.13 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is twice here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ay, duplicate. I will remove it
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
documentation_complete: true | |||
|
|||
prodtype: fedora,ol7,ol8,rhel6,rhel7,rhel8,sle15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is sle15 removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be part of the merging and rebasing issues.
It was not my intention to remove it.
I will restore it.
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ references: | |||
cis-csc: 11,13,14,3,8,9 | |||
anssi: NT28(R12) | |||
srg: SRG-OS-000368-GPOS-00154 | |||
cis@sle15: 1.1.6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sle15 removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
restored
@openscap-ci ok to test |
/ok-to-test |
@willumpie Great! Thanks. |
|
Description:
Rationale:
Make rules available for Ubuntu 1804