Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add config for Ansible lint #9838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

Mab879
Copy link
Member

@Mab879 Mab879 commented Nov 16, 2022

Description:

Adds an Ansible lint config to the project.

Rationale:

To better match the old Ansible lint.

In the future, we should fix some of the things like using fully quality module names.

Alternative to #9837

@Mab879 Mab879 added the Infrastructure Our content build system label Nov 16, 2022
@Mab879 Mab879 added this to the 0.1.65 milestone Nov 16, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

Fedora Environment
Open in Gitpod

Oracle Linux 8 Environment
Open in Gitpod

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 16, 2022

Code Climate has analyzed commit 4db3591 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 47.1% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@yuumasato yuumasato self-assigned this Nov 17, 2022
Copy link
Member

@yuumasato yuumasato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
I talked offline with @ggbecker and he leans towards this solution as well.

@yuumasato yuumasato merged commit adfd280 into ComplianceAsCode:master Nov 17, 2022
@Mab879 Mab879 deleted the lossen_rules_ansible_lint branch November 17, 2022 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Infrastructure Our content build system
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants