Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade grunt-cli from 1.3.2 to 1.4.3 #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DanyRay420
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade grunt-cli from 1.3.2 to 1.4.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 4 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 3 years ago, on 2021-05-25.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-DECODEURICOMPONENT-3149970
696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Proof of Concept
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-UNSETVALUE-2400660
696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
No Known Exploit
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHPARSE-1077067
696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Release notes
Package name: grunt-cli from grunt-cli GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: grunt-cli

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants