Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

link config #24547

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023
Merged

link config #24547

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

Nodebrute
Copy link
Contributor

@Nodebrute Nodebrute commented Aug 14, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #24288
$ #24288 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open a chat in Safari.
  2. Click on the phone icon located in the header.
  3. Choose either Google Meet or Zoom.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for TextLink

  1. Launch the app in Safari.
  2. Log out if currently logged in.
  3. Click on any link on the login page, such as 'Expense Management' or 'Spend Management'.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for addPaypalMePage

  1. Go to settings and navigate to the 'Payments' section.
  2. Click on add payment method -> 'PayPal.me'.
  3. Click on the list of supported countries.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for BankAccountStep

  1. Navigate to the settings, then to the 'Workspace' section, and select a workspace.
  2. Click on 'Bank Account' option.
  3. Click on 'Your Data is Secure'.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for openOldDotLink

  1. Navigate to the settings, then to the 'Workspace' section, and select a workspace.
  2. Click on invoices
  3. Click on View All Invoices
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

  1. Open a chat in Safari.
  2. Click on the phone icon located in the header.
  3. Choose either Google Meet or Zoom.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for TextLink

  1. Launch the app in Safari.
  2. Log out if currently logged in.
  3. Click on any link on the login page, such as 'Expense Management' or 'Spend Management'.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for addPaypalMePage

  1. Go to settings and navigate to the 'Payments' section.
  2. Click on add payment method -> 'PayPal.me'.
  3. Click on the list of supported countries.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for BankAccountStep

  1. Navigate to the settings, then to the 'Workspace' section, and select a workspace.
  2. Click on 'Bank Account' option.
  3. Click on 'Your Data is Secure'.
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.

Test steps for openOldDotLink

  1. Navigate to the settings, then to the 'Workspace' section, and select a workspace.
  2. Click on invoices
  3. Click on View All Invoices
  4. Ensure that the link opens in a new tab rather than a new window.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-08-14.at.7.31.39.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
chrome.android.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-08-14.at.8.01.13.PM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-08-14.at.11.12.42.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-08-14.at.8.29.07.PM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-08-14.at.11.35.01.PM.mov

@Nodebrute Nodebrute requested a review from a team as a code owner August 14, 2023 18:40
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from sobitneupane and removed request for a team August 14, 2023 18:40
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 14, 2023

@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.20.25.15.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-08-17.at.21.58.28.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-08-17.at.22.00.02.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-08-17.at.22.00.30.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-08-17.at.22.00.48.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.20.33.02.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.20.32.04.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.20.30.37.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.20.43.17.mov
Android

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from techievivek August 15, 2023 15:00
techievivek
techievivek previously approved these changes Aug 16, 2023
@@ -40,15 +41,15 @@ function BaseVideoChatButtonAndMenu(props) {
text: props.translate('videoChatButtonAndMenu.zoom'),
onPress: () => {
setIsVideoChatMenuActive(false);
Linking.openURL(CONST.NEW_ZOOM_MEETING_URL);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sobitneupane @Nodebrute I can still see some usage of this method in App repo, do you think it makes sense to update them(at least for external links) otherwise this would still be broken for the safari, right?

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane Can you please re-review the PR here, thanks.

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

@Nodebrute Can you please add test steps for all those changes?

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

sobitneupane commented Aug 17, 2023

NAB: @techievivek I think we should either use asyncOpenUrl (with promise and url as parameter) instead of openExternalLink or add another parameter in openExternalLink to not show growl in offline. I think even when user is offline it makes sense to open a new tab with url in most of the cases.

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane

I think even when user is offline it makes sense to open a new tab with url in most of the cases.

💯, if we can fix that it will be great.

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

@Nodebrute Sorry for the iterations, but could you please implement the requested changes? Thanks.

@Nodebrute
Copy link
Contributor Author

@techievivek Not a problem! @sobitneupane Should I disable the growl in all instances when the user is offline, or do we want this change to be implemented selectively in certain areas? Here are the locations where I've made changes.

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

techievivek commented Aug 17, 2023

@Nodebrute

Should I disable the growl in all instances when the user is offline, or do we want this change to be implemented selectively in certain areas?

If it's an external link then we can disable the growl and open the URL in a new tab. If we are not sure if it's external or internal then I think we can just show the Growl.

@Nodebrute
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nodebrute commented Aug 17, 2023

@sobitneupane @techievivek I believe we're currently utilizing the 'openExternalLink' function exclusively for opening external links. Therefore, it seems safe to consider removing the following code block:

if (showGrowlIfOffline()) {
    return;
}

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

@Nodebrute, I agree. Can you confirm we don't call that method on an internal link? If we don't use the method on an internal link, let's remove that.

@Nodebrute
Copy link
Contributor Author

@techievivek @sobitneupane I conducted testing on this yesterday, and I found that all of these links are indeed external. Upon retesting, it remains clear that we are exclusively dealing with external links in this context. I've removed the growl. Please test it on your end to ensure its accuracy.

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update @Nodebrute.

Changes look good and test well.

@techievivek We are good to merge this.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from techievivek August 17, 2023 16:25
Copy link
Contributor

@techievivek techievivek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks.

@techievivek techievivek merged commit b7fdbcb into Expensify:main Aug 17, 2023
16 checks passed
@Nodebrute
Copy link
Contributor Author

@techievivek @sobitneupane Thank you to both of you.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/techievivek in version: 1.3.56-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.56-24 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants